The United States has entrusted Europe with drafting a resolution against Iran to allow it to be approved by more consensus. Europe also sought to increase the likelihood of a consensus or high vote in the resolution by amending the resolution after the first round of meetings, but in the end the consensus was not reached.

NOURNEWS - Following the presentation of the political and directional report of Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the adoption of the European Anti-Iranian Resolution in the IAEA Board of Governors, it appears that despite a joint plan to reach a consensus against Iran, the plan ultimately failed due to two negative votes and seven abstentions.

In this design, the United States had entrusted the preparation and presentation of the resolution to Europe in order to make it possible to pass it with greater consensus. Europe has also sought to increase the likelihood of consensus or a high vote in the resolution by claiming to amend the resolution after the first round.

By taking political action and complying with the oppressive, non-technical, non-specialized and purely political demands of the United States and its European allies against Iran, the IAEA has taken another step in shaking the global position and increasing the world's distrust of this international body.

The IAEA has acted against Iran while Mr. Grossi has so far made no attempt to dismantle the Zionist regime's weapons and nuclear facilities, which pose a serious threat to regional and global security, and this calls into question his will to maintain the IAEA's independence and its nuclear disarmament duties.

The IAEA's recent anti-Iranian action comes as Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and Donald Trump have repeatedly made it a priority to upgrade their nuclear weapons, and the IAEA has not taken a stand on the issue.

On the other hand, however; Iran has always adhered to the JCPOA's commitments and cooperation with the IAEA, and as reported by several IAEA reports, no violations have been committed so far.

Instead of making false claims against Iran, European countries should report on the extent to which they have fulfilled their obligations to the IAEA Board? If these three European countries are really looking for world security, instead of resorting to the policy of forcible burning and coercion against Iran, they should take action to end the existence of 200 US nuclear warheads in Germany, which is a threat to the whole of Europe.

Note that; The lifting of Iran's arms embargo under UNSCR 2231 is irreversible, and Europe and the United States cannot spy on it to prevent Iran from reacting, if their non-alignment causes Iran to take five steps to reduce Borjam's commitments.

China and Russia 's opposition to the IAEA's actions toward Iran is also a sign of a global approach to multilateralism, proving the West's failure to reach a consensus against Iran.

Based on this; The West should know that their behavior is the abolition of the JCPOA, and that it will cost the countries more than Iran, and at least that shows the global distrust of them and the proof of the non-commitment and irresponsibility of these countries.


Post a comment